United Kingdom · 1986 – 2026

The Ratchet

How dissent became a crime in Britain — one act, one clause, one exemplary sentence at a time. A ratchet only turns one way. Until it breaks.

Taken alone, each measure below was defended as reasonable, and each drew concern in its moment. It is the cumulative weight — visible only from the distance of years — that reveals the pattern no single headline could.

Regimes never say "we want more police powers and less civil liberties." — Totalitarian Timeline in the UK, May 2023
Scroll. The page darkens as the law tightens. ↓
Era I · 1986–2016

Laying the groundwork

Each power arrives with a reassurance: it will only be used against someone else. Each becomes the foundation the next one is built on.

1986

Public Order Act 1986

Police gain the power to impose conditions on marches and assemblies. The baseline statute that nearly every later crackdown amends and extends.

Statute
1994

Criminal Justice and Public Order Act

"Aggravated trespass" is invented — protest on private land becomes a crime, not a civil matter. The right to silence is weakened. Even gatherings with "repetitive beats" are targeted.

Statute
2000

Terrorism Act 2000, section 44

Suspicionless stop-and-search, justified by terrorism, used in practice against protesters and journalists for a decade.

Statute
2010

Strasbourg strikes down s.44

The European Court of Human Rights rules the suspicionless search power unlawful (Gillan & Quinton v UK) — after roughly ten years of use. The pattern is set: the power operates first, the court arrives later.

Courts push back
2005

Serious Organised Crime and Police Act

Unauthorised protest within one kilometre of Parliament becomes a criminal offence — legislation aimed substantially at a single man, Brian Haw, and his peace camp in Parliament Square.

Statute
2012

LASPO: legal aid gutted, squatting criminalised

The ability of ordinary people to contest the state in court is quietly de-funded, while occupying an empty building becomes a crime.

Statute
2016

Investigatory Powers Act — the "Snoopers' Charter"

Bulk interception, bulk hacking and bulk retention of communications data are written into law. The infrastructure of total visibility is now statutory.

Statute
Era II · 2019–2021

Testing the resistance

Mass civil disobedience returns to Britain's streets. The state probes how far existing powers stretch — and starts drafting new ones.

APR 2019

Extinction Rebellion holds central London

Over 1,100 arrests in ten days. Bridges and squares occupied by teachers, doctors, grandparents. The politics of protest policing changes overnight.

On the ground
OCT 2019

The Met bans protest across all of London

A blanket section 14 order prohibits any Extinction Rebellion assembly anywhere in the capital. Hundreds are arrested under it.

On the ground
NOV 2019

High Court: the London-wide ban was unlawful

The ban is quashed — but only after it has already done its work. Arrest first, litigate later.

Courts push back
MAR 2021

The Clapham Common vigil

Women gathering to mourn Sarah Everard — killed by a serving police officer — are pinned to the ground and handcuffed by police. The following year the High Court finds the Met breached the organisers' rights.

On the ground
2021

"Kill the Bill"

Protests erupt nationwide against the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. In Bristol, participants later receive some of the longest riot sentences in decades. The bill passes anyway.

On the ground
Era III · 2022–2023

The ratchet, written into law

Two acts in two years transform the legal landscape of protest. What was a fine becomes a prison sentence; what was a tactic becomes an offence.

APR 2022

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act

Protests can be restricted for being too noisy. Damaging a memorial: up to ten years. Wilful obstruction of the highway — for a century a matter of a small fine — now carries imprisonment. Even one-person protests can be conditioned.

Statute
OCT 2022

Two climbers on the Dartford Crossing

Morgan Trowland and Marcus Decker of Just Stop Oil scale the Queen Elizabeth II bridge, closing it for over a day. No one is hurt. Their sentences will set a new benchmark.

On the ground
FEB 2023

Jailed for telling the jury why

Insulate Britain defendant David Nixon is imprisoned for eight weeks for contempt of court — his offence was explaining his climate motivation to the jury after Judge Silas Reid forbade it. Others follow him to the cells for the same words.

Sentence
MAR 2023

Lawyers Are Responsible

More than one hundred lawyers — six King's Counsel among them — sign a Declaration of Conscience refusing to prosecute peaceful climate protesters, openly breaking the cab-rank rule. The revolt reaches the bar itself.

Courts push back
MAY 2023

Public Order Act 2023

Measures the House of Lords threw out of the 2022 act are simply reintroduced and passed: criminal offences of "locking on" and tunnelling, Serious Disruption Prevention Orders — protest banning orders for individuals — and suspicionless stop-and-search, this time explicitly for protest. It comes into force days before the Coronation; the head of the anti-monarchy group Republic is arrested that morning, luggage straps in hand.

Statute
JUN 2023

"Serious disruption" redefined as "more than minor"

After Parliament rejects the change once, the government re-enacts it through secondary legislation — lowering the threshold at which police can shut a protest down to almost nothing.

Statute
OCT 2023

Online Safety Act

The censorship apparatus goes digital: sweeping duties over "harmful" content, and powers that put end-to-end encryption itself on notice. The same ratchet, applied to speech online.

Statute
MAY 2024

High Court: that regulation was unlawful

In a challenge brought by Liberty, the court finds the government acted outside its powers. The government's response is not repeal — it is appeal.

Courts push back
Era IV · 2023–2024

Exemplary sentences

The courts begin handing down punishments designed to be heard about. The message is the sentence.

APR 2023

Three years for climbing a bridge

Trowland receives three years, Decker two years and seven months — at the time, the longest sentences for peaceful climate protest in modern British history. Decker, a long-settled European national, is then threatened with deportation; a tribunal later blocks it.

Sentence
APR 2024

The Trudi Warner case collapses

A retired social worker held a sign outside a courtroom stating a centuries-old principle: jurors may acquit according to their conscience. The Solicitor General sought to prosecute her for contempt. The High Court throws the case out as "fanciful". The state attempted to criminalise a sentence engraved at the Old Bailey.

Courts push back
JUL 2024

Five years for a Zoom call

The "Whole Truth Five": Roger Hallam sentenced to five years, four others to four, for planning the M25 protests on a video call. The longest sentences ever imposed in Britain for peaceful protest organising. A UN special rapporteur attends the trial and calls the prosecutions something "not acceptable in a democracy". The Court of Appeal later trims some terms — and upholds the approach.

Sentence
SEP 2024

Two years for soup on glass

Phoebe Plummer is sentenced to two years for throwing soup at Van Gogh's Sunflowers — a painting protected by glass and undamaged. Around the same courts, sentences for actual violence routinely run shorter.

Sentence
How it works

Nothing new had to be passed

Since 2000, the law has defined "terrorism" to include serious damage to property — no injury to any person required — where three tests are met:

  • 1the act is designed to influence the government or intimidate the public;
  • 2it is done to advance a political, religious or ideological cause;
  • 3it involves serious violence, serious damage to property, or endangers life.

By this definition, a spray can wielded for a political cause has been chargeable as terrorism for twenty-five years. The gun was always loaded. What changed was the decision to fire it at protesters.

A precise point, because precision is the armour: no retroactive crime was invented — that would be unlawful. A past protest is simply charged now under a definition that applied all along. The escalation is not in the statute book. It is in the will to use it.

Era V · 2025

Protest becomes terrorism

The final turn of the ratchet: the machinery built for al-Qaeda is pointed at people holding cardboard signs.

JUN 2025

Paint on warplanes at Brize Norton

Palestine Action activists spray paint into the engines of RAF aircraft. Criminal damage, plainly — and the trigger for something without precedent.

On the ground
JUL 2025

A protest group is proscribed as a terrorist organisation

Palestine Action is banned under the Terrorism Act 2000 — the first direct-action protest group listed alongside al-Qaeda and ISIS. Membership or expressing support: up to fourteen years in prison.

Statute
2024–25

Property damage, tried as terrorism

Activists arrested under section 41 of the Terrorism Act over the 2024 break-in at Elbit Systems' Filton site in Bristol are prosecuted as terrorists — for spray paint and broken equipment, with no allegation that anyone was harmed. The trials run under heavy reporting restrictions: defendants say they cannot put their motivation, or Gaza, before the jury at all.

Sentence
NOV 2025

The ban reaches court — and the judge is swapped

Huda Ammori, a Palestine Action co-founder, wins permission to judicially review the proscription — the first such challenge to a banned organisation. Days before the November 2025 hearing, the judge who granted permission is replaced by a three-judge panel. Campaigners, including Defend Our Juries, call it a "stitch-up". The hearing goes ahead, contested.

Courts push back
2025 →

Mass arrests for holding a sign

Retirees, priests, veterans and carers are arrested in their thousands for signs reading "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action." More than 2,200 are detained in the months after the ban — reportedly more arrests than the entire post-2000 "war on terror". The arrest queues become the protest. The state has finally built a law so broad that enforcing it manufactures dissidents faster than it can process them.

On the ground
The turn

It had to get this bad

Every clause created a constituency against it. Every exemplary sentence made an example — of the system. Grandmothers with signs, jurors with consciences, judges striking down regulations: the ratchet tightened until the handle snapped.

A system that must criminalise soup, placards and Zoom calls to survive is not strong. It is finished, and it knows.

None of this is hindsight. The warning was published in May 2023, while the ink on the Public Order Act was still wet. The timeline since has only confirmed it.

We are not asking the system to fix itself.
We are welcoming a better one.

Cast your vote — Planetary Council →

Vote · Share · Say what you think · #OvergrowTheRegime