Skip to content
Independent Tribunal · Research

Craig Murray

A former ambassador and blogger, sentenced for contempt over jigsaw identification, now reporting from the Palestine Action hearings

Placeholder profile. In 2021 the High Court of Justiciary found Craig Murray, a former UK ambassador, in contempt of court for blog posts about the Alex Salmond trial that were likely to lead to the identification of complainers protected by a court order, and sentenced him to eight months’ imprisonment. The case is the leading modern example of jigsaw identification by a blogger. In November 2026 he published attendee accounts of the Supreme Court hearing on the Palestine Action ban, which we cite as partisan courtroom reports.

Scotland; England and Wales · Sources reviewed

25 March 2021Found in contemptBreach of a section 11 order11 May 2021Eight monthsLater held proportionateNovember 2026Supreme Court reportsPalestine Action hearing, days 1 and 2

Placeholder, opened 12 November 2026. The 2021 finding and the sentencing statement have been read; the permission ruling, the Supreme Court refusal and the 2022 petitions have not yet been read and checked.

The 2021 contempt case

Why this profile exists: the case shows how material that is harmless piece by piece can, put together, breach a court order.

Judgment (High Court of Justiciary) ·

The finding

HM Advocate v Craig Murray [2021] HCJ 2

Alex Salmond was tried at the High Court in Edinburgh from 9 March 2020 and acquitted on all charges on 23 March 2020. Craig Murray had published articles about the arrest and prosecution.

[1] para 1

The High Court of Justiciary, in an opinion delivered by Lady Dorrian, the Lord Justice Clerk, sitting with Lord Menzies and Lord Turnbull, found that blog posts by Craig Murray breached an order under section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The order prohibited publishing the complainers’ names or any information likely to disclose their identity.

[1] Judgment (High Court of Justiciary) · [2] Legal news report of a judgment (High Court of Justiciary)

The test the court applied was whether the material, judged objectively, was likely to lead to identification by members of the public, not only by people who already knew the complainers. The court rejected a separate allegation that articles about a dismissed juror breached a section 4(2) postponement order.

[2] Legal news report of a judgment (High Court of Justiciary) · [3] Legal news report of a judgment (High Court of Justiciary)

Legal news report of a judgment ·

The sentence and the appeal

On 11 May 2021 the court imposed eight months’ imprisonment, and delayed the warrant for three weeks to allow an appeal.

[4] Sentencing statement

In June 2021 the court refused permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court. It held the sentence proportionate, noting that the maximum is two years, and said his conduct struck at the heart of the fair administration of justice. It suspended the warrant for four weeks to allow a direct application to the Supreme Court.

[3] Legal news report of a judgment (High Court of Justiciary)

His recent reporting we cite

We cite his blog as an attendee’s account, labelled as partisan, never as a transcript.

Blog reporting ·

The Palestine Action hearing in the Supreme Court

He published accounts of the first and second days of the Supreme Court hearing on the Palestine Action ban, including the closed session. We use them for courtroom detail, cross-checked against other reports.

[5] Blog (partisan attendee account) · [6] Blog (partisan attendee account)

Not yet covered

What this placeholder still needs.

Coverage limitation

Gaps

Still to read and add: the June 2021 opinion refusing permission to appeal, reported as [2021] HCJ 3; reports that the UK Supreme Court itself refused permission in July 2021; and the 2022 opinions on his petitions to the nobile officium, reported as [2022] HCJAC 5 and [2022] HCJAC 14. We have not yet read them, and we do not yet state how much of the sentence he served.

Source register

Sources are numbered in order of first citation; repeated citations keep their number. Source links open in a new tab. A source’s type matters: a campaign statement or personal account is not a judgment. The review date records this page’s source check, not a guarantee of completeness.

  1. HM Advocate v Craig Murray [2021] HCJ 2High Court of Justiciary (Lady Dorrian, Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Menzies; Lord Turnbull) · Judgment (High Court of Justiciary) · 2021-03-25
    Checked 2026-11-12
  2. Former UK ambassador held in contempt of court for Salmond case publicationsScottish Legal News · Legal news report of a judgment (High Court of Justiciary) · 2021-03-30
    Checked 2026-11-12
  3. Ex-diplomat found in contempt of court over Salmond case refused permission to appeal to Supreme CourtScottish Legal News · Legal news report of a judgment (High Court of Justiciary) · 2021-06-10
    Checked 2026-11-12
  4. Craig Murray: Petition and Complaint (sentencing statement)Judiciary of Scotland · Sentencing statement · 2021-05-11
    Checked 2026-11-12
  5. Palestine Action Supreme Court Hearing Day 1Craig Murray (personal blog) · Blog (partisan attendee account) · 2026-11-05
    Checked 2026-11-12
  6. Palestine Action Supreme Court Hearing Day 2Craig Murray (personal blog) · Blog (partisan attendee account) · 2026-11-08
    Checked 2026-11-12

Related research

View the maintained source · Submit a source or correction. Do not post private case material publicly.

Sources reviewed 2026-11-12 · Download JSON · Edit history